Independent, source-led Mobile RASP guidanceRead our editorial standard

Field-ready controls

Mobile RASP Checklists

Use these checklists as review prompts. Each item needs an owner and evidence; a checked box without either is not a control.

Architecture

  • Protected assets and abuse outcomes are documented.
  • Client, platform, attestation service, and backend trust boundaries are drawn.
  • Signals, confidence, freshness, binding, decision, and response are separated.
  • Offline and dependency-failure behavior is approved.
  • Critical authorization remains server-side.

Implementation

  • Protected builds are reproducible and identifiable.
  • SDK or transformation versions are pinned and inventoried.
  • Android and iOS signing and symbol workflows are verified.
  • Backend contracts reject self-asserted client trust.
  • Performance, privacy, and accessibility budgets are defined.

Testing

  • Release-equivalent artifacts are used.
  • Threat-led, bypass, negative, and regression cases are versioned.
  • The device and OS matrix reflects the real fleet.
  • App, transport, backend decision, and business outcome are captured.
  • Residual risk is reported without absolute language.

Operations

  • Events preserve facts separately from conclusions.
  • Policy changes are versioned, approved, staged, and reversible.
  • SOC, fraud, support, privacy, and engineering ownership is clear.
  • Protection absence and provider failure are monitored.
  • Incidents and false positives create regression tests.

Procurement

  • Candidates test the same scenarios in representative code.
  • Platform parity and unsupported combinations are disclosed.
  • Data flows, residency, retention, and deletion are documented.
  • Update, vulnerability, support, and incident SLAs are contractual.
  • Policy export, de-instrumentation, and exit support are defined.