Try “attestation”, “Frida”, “OWASP”, or “false positives”.
Map evidence carefully
Practical mappings between Mobile RASP and OWASP MASVS/MASTG, NIST SSDF, MITRE ATT&CK Mobile, PCI mobile payment standards, privacy, and assurance frameworks.
Working position
Mobile RASP can support control objectives and supply technical evidence, but it does not make an application compliant by itself. A defensible mapping states the requirement, the runtime contribution, the complementary controls, the test evidence, and the residual gap.
Complete topic set
OWASP MASVS-RESILIENCE frames resilience against reverse engineering and tampering as a defense-in-depth concern for applications whose threat model justifies it. Mobile RASP can implement or support several runtime aspects.
Read guideThe OWASP Mobile Application Security Testing Guide supplies knowledge, techniques, and test cases that help teams turn Mobile RASP capability claims into reproducible assessments on Android and iOS.
Read guideNIST SP 800-218 organizes secure development into preparing the organization, protecting software, producing well-secured software, and responding to vulnerabilities. Mobile RASP can be governed as one risk-based technical practice within that lifecycle.
Read guideMITRE ATT&CK Mobile catalogs observed adversary tactics and techniques across mobile platforms. It can inform threat scenarios, though its techniques are not a product control checklist or assurance standard.
Read guidePCI MPoC defines a modular security and evaluation framework for payment acceptance on commercial off-the-shelf mobile devices. Runtime protections may contribute within a solution but must be assessed in the applicable scope.
Read guidePCI SPoC addresses software-based PIN entry on commercial devices with an approved secure card reader and a defined solution architecture. Runtime protection is only one part of that security model.
Read guidePSD2 strong customer authentication and its regulatory technical standards define authentication and transaction-related requirements for payment services. Mobile RASP may help protect app integrity and authentication workflows but is not an authentication factor.
Read guideThe EU Digital Operational Resilience Act addresses ICT risk management, incident reporting, resilience testing, information sharing, and third-party risk for in-scope financial entities. Mobile RASP can support selected application risk controls and evidence.
Read guideThe HIPAA Security Rule requires appropriate administrative, physical, and technical safeguards for electronic protected health information held by covered entities and business associates. Mobile RASP may support risk-selected technical safeguards.
Read guideMobile RASP telemetry may be personal data when it relates to a user, account, device, or behavior. GDPR analysis therefore needs purpose, legal basis, transparency, minimization, security, retention, rights, transfers, and processor governance.
Read guideISO/IEC 27001 defines requirements for an information security management system. Mobile RASP can be one treatment for identified application risks and can generate evidence for operated technical controls.
Read guideA SOC 2 engagement examines controls relevant to selected Trust Services Criteria at a service organization. Mobile RASP may be part of the described system and provide evidence for security or availability controls.
Read guideNo guides match that filter.
Test before trust
